Thứ Bảy, 19 tháng 1, 2013

Philippine Call Center Services For Start Ups and SMEs

Prevalent opinion is that outsourcing is only for multinational corporations with big operational budgets and a large number of customers that need specialized call center services. That is not exactly true. Philippine call center services are available for start up businesses and SMEs or small to medium enterprises based anywhere in the world. In fact, the reason why small companies should consider outsourcing their call center need and administrative needs is because they need to save on operational costs.

According to a report from the US Small Business Administration, on an average, about 40% of small business' time is spent on administrative tasks that could well be delegated to offshore outsourcing business that specializes in these back office business processes. That leaves more time for SMEs to concentrate on what is important in their business which is growth and development.
Philippine call center telecommunications infrastructures were developed to handle transactions from every corner of the world. Corporate clients can rest easy knowing that their business transactions are handled by professionals and experienced agents but at lower costs. Companies specializing in outsourcing services are equipped to deal with variety of services.
Telemarketing Services

Small companies in the US can benefit from the relatively low cost of labor in call center companies in India and the Philippines. Aside the cost, contact centers have already earned a degree of expertise when it comes to selling over the telephone. If the small company had to the cold calling on their own, they would have to interview, hire, and train the new employees that will work exclusively for them.
Customer Service Representatives

In Philippine call center, the agents have a neutral accent that is pleasant and comprehensible to western ears. This is where the Philippines have the most advantage over Indians who have thick Indian accents that are hard to get rid of. SMEs can partner with call centers that also accept small accounts. It is important to get trained people who can speak professionally with customers and can handle difficult situations like customer complaints. Another benefit to partnering with call centers in the Philippines is the natural service oriented personality of the agents.
Administrative and Back office processes

Many call center offices in the Philippines also handle back office processes and administrative work. Outsourcing companies in the Philippines and other countries employ college graduates who may or may not have previous experience. There is a higher level of education in these countries in response to the growing demand for educated workers in call center and BPOs (Business Process Outsourcing). Small and Medium enterprises can focus on their core strengths after partnering with a reliable outsourcing company. Even if the virtual assistant who answers their emails and calls is far from their main offices, the telecommunications infrastructure and Internet is developed enough that agents can perform these administrative tasks even an ocean away from office headquarters.

While small and medium enterprises would greatly benefit from outsourcing some of their tasks, it is important to do background checks on the company you wish to partner with. A great suggestion is to propose a test run or a pilot run before you fully commit to one company. Evaluate their performance and decide whether to sign a full-fledge contract to minimize the risk on your part.

A computer graduate and loves to travel. Reading current news in the internet is one of his past times. Taking pictures of the things around him fully satisfies him. He loves to play badminton and his favorite pets are cats and walk with them in the park with some dogs.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/4700552

Thứ Sáu, 18 tháng 1, 2013

Bored of Working a 9-5? Discover Some of the Benefits of Working in the Aviation Industry

Have you had enough of working the same hours week in week out?

Or

Are you just starting out in the working world and would like to consider your career options?
It's a fact that the Aviation industry is one of the most rapidly growing industries in the world. It's not just people that are travelling more; produce from many countries is travelling across the globe on a daily basis.

Since the industry is expanding there has been an increase in job opportunities for people with many different skills, interests and experience. These roles include:

- Flight Deck
- Cabin Crew
- Airside Ground Staff
- Technical Support Staff
- Professional and Executive Staff

The great thing about working in the Aviation industry is that wherever your talents lie there will be a role that could help you achieve your career aspirations.
For example;

Working as a Pilot or a member of the Cabin Crew will give you an exciting opportunity to travel the world, meet different people and experience cultures on a level that most people can only dream of. If the idea of this excites you then investigating a career in this area should be high on your priority list!
It's easy to get bored or de-motivated if you're doing the same work all the time or sitting at the same desk but with a career in the fast paced world of aviation, you can be confident that no two days will be the same.

Of course it's not all fun and games, the work can be tiring and being away from home frequently can be difficult but with the possibility of seeing parts of the world that many people will never see, the benefits for many people far outweigh the negatives.
For further information on the different types of jobs available in the Aviation industry, please visit:

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/4716609

Easy Ways for Kids to Practice Writing Prompts

The mind of small a child is similar to a blank canvas. You can paint whatever you want to on that plain slate. They might feel confused when they want to think of something that they don't know. Here they require adult supervision. Helper can either be their parents or teacher, as these are the only two types of relations children are most of the time learning from. There is a possibility of some other relations as well. Just check with whom your kid is comfortable in learning. It is not a rocket science. Just give them simple writing prompts to start the process.

The basic formula is to ask them questions and move with that on paper. Basic types of questions could start from What, How, When Where or some wish related. Here are some examples.
Explain to your child that every situation consists of an event, thoughts, feelings and behaviors. Emphasize that the same situation can lead to two different thoughts and that the thoughts cause different feelings and behavior.

E.g. How will you go to school if it will rain today?
There can be number of answers to the question like,
I will not go to school and will have some fun with my family or
I will go by bus and won't walk to school or I will walk with my umbrella to school and won't get wet.

Now try asking them Do you like rain? Do you get scared by lightening? What if you get wet in rain?
You can get a variety of thoughts as per emotions of the child. Like if they feel happy in the rain or they feel worried. Lightening scares them or they get excited for more rain to come.

Elaborate their thoughts in words. Try some story making. Start a story and let them add the details. As you will move on you will realize that your child contributed a lot using his/hers thoughts and imagination. E.g. I was playing in the park and there I saw a kitten in the tree and what was the kitten doing? Answers could be, she was crying for help, she was stuck in the tree and couldn't jump down. She was catching a bird etc. Now on the basis of the reply from the child, carry on with the story making. Kids enjoy that. You can name a story like My visit to the park or the cat's rescue

Thinking is a very fun activity for kids. They use their tiny experiences and mental capacity to make a good piece of writing. Like, what do doctors do? Children will answer this according to what they know and observe. E.g. Doctor takes care of the sick, doctors give yuck medicine and use injections on naughty kids, they help you get better, they work in a hospital, they take out your bad tooth etc. After some thought collection, ask them to write about doctors or their visit to a doctor.

Kids loving imagining. They all have some wishes. Like what do you wish to be when you get older? Answers could be like; I wish I was a pilot and could see the city from the sky. I wish to become a doctor and help the sick. I wish it was a holiday today and I would go play with my friends.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/7301312

Is Cabin Crew a Good Career?

Most people have the impression that being a cabin crew is just a high class waiter and nothing more. So I am not surprise that I get the above question the most when they intend to apply as one. There are actually career progressions for when you join as a junior crew whether you chose to fly or prefer a management position on ground.

Let's start with the bottom position all the way to the top if you chose to be a cabin crew as a lifelong career. Different airlines have different rank for example in MAS/SQ, there are four ranking from a normal Flight stewardess to leading stewardess, chief stewardess and finally In flight supervisor.
As for emirates you start off as a grade 2 (economy), then to Grade 1 (Business), Fg1 (First class), SFS (Senior Flight Stewardess), Purser and finally to the highest which is the SFP (Senior flight purser).

As a FP or IFS, you are in charge of the overall cabin which may have as many as 400 to 850 passengers depending on which aircraft you operate. That is a huge responsibility and though it is a plane, that is like a restaurant with 80 tables assuming 10 people to 1 table.

After the role as a FP or IFS, you can chose to become a cabin crew manager who is in charge of the overall welfare, performance and promotion of the cabin crew. Besides, you can also apply as cabin crew recruitment manager. So as you can see from the above, there is a steady progression in your career and promotion normally depends on how well you perform in your job.

I have known people who flew for their entire life and they enjoy every single minute of it. I guess in whatever career you chose, you need to have a passion and interest for it and if you do, I can tell you that you will not feel like dragging yourself to work each time and in fact look forward to it. As for me, I really do enjoy flying and each month I look forward to my roster, getting ready to experience and explore whatever destination that I have been rostered.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/5488254

Busting Japanese Myths With Matthew Alt, Founder of AltJapan

Long before Hollywood films like Lost in Translation popularized contemporary Japan in the imagination, Matthew Alt of AltJapan was actually finding himself in translation. As a technical translator for the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and later as a producer of English versions of Japanese video games, Alt understood Japanese culture well enough to move to Japan, start a business, while remaining relatively immune to the impact of the culture shock that sometimes confronts newcomers.

To hear Alt talk about Japan could best be described as cultural immersion. Perhaps owing to a decade of living and working in Japan, Alt has skillfully brought pieces of the cultural puzzle together, demystifying many aspects of contemporary Japan via books, articles on CNNGo and Wired, and most recently, his interview with AsianTalks. Here's what he had to say about Japan, a country he now calls home.

AT: How long have you been living as an expatriate in Japan, and was living abroad always on the horizon for you?

This year marks my ninth year here in Tokyo. But I was raised in Washington DC, in the suburbs there.

Japan was a big thing for me. I've been studying Japanese ever since I was a kid - 14 or 15 years old. And before coming here I worked for the Patent and Trademark Office as a technical translator and I enjoyed it very much, but the time came when I wanted to strike out on my own. And that's when Hiroko and I founded AltJapan.

AT: Tell us about your company.

Our main business produces the English versions of Japanese video games, but also comic books, animations and film, things like that. But on the side we write books that are basically about Japanese culture, and the connection between Japanese traditional and pop culture.
The first book we wrote together was called "Hello Please!" It's about cute characters, like the cute mascot characters you see all over the place on Japanese signs and Japanese books. In the book we talk about why Japanese are so obsessed with cute characters like that.

AT: And why all the obsession with cuteness?

Well you know, it's interesting. We get this question a lot. And I think a lot of people misinterpret this obsession with cuteness, with a kind of condescension or infantilization. But that isn't the case at all here. I mean Japan has a culture that is very comfortable with cuteness. You can embrace cuteness without necessarily sacrificing your masculinity or seeming like a child, and a perfect example of this is the Japan Self-Defense Forces (JSDF), they have cute mascots that look like something that stepped right out of South Park!

I think the simplest answer is because cute mascot characters play a wonderful role of being kind of mediators in Japan, going in between organizations that might seem powerful and scary, and reaching out to individuals they need to reach out to.

AT: Do you have any advice for launching your own business? How did you get your start?

We moved gradually. We didn't just say to ourselves, "We're going to quit everything and just start a company." I think it's really important to have realistic expectations when you go into something like that. And in our case that meant working at night and on the weekends to build up our client base, our business, before taking the plunge, and saying okay this is doing well enough, that we know if we put more time into it, that we can build it into something bigger.

AT: What's it like to work with your spouse?

(Laughs) We get this question a lot! We love it. But you know I don't know if it would work for everybody, it's just our personality types mesh very well. Whereas I am kind of the more outgoing person and tend to be focused more on sales, and bringing in new clients, and Hiroko is a very meticulous type of person who is much more suited than I am toward balancing books and keeping things on track with discipline and things like that.

AT: In addition to your main business, you've written several pieces for CNNGo. How do you come up with your article ideas and how does Japan inspire you?

My last article grew out of a frustration that I share with a lot of my friends. The Western media tends to take what seem like strange aspects of Japanese culture, take them out of context, compare them to how Americans would do them, and use it as a chance to say "Wow, aren't the Japanese weird."
And I don't think necessarily they're trying to be condescending but at its very worst it comes across as borderline Orientalist. Like, "Look at these strange people and their strange customs." But the fact of the matter is when you start examining each one of these so-called weird or strange things in context, you realize that there's an essential humanity to them, an essential logic that isn't very strange at all, unless you take it out of context.

And Hiroko and I are personally very much into what I call myth busting or bubble-bursting. For example we wrote an entire book about ninja. I mean, why are foreigners so obsessed with ninja? Why are foreigners so obsessed with things like this, and explored that. And basically most of our ideas come from frustration, asking why people are misunderstanding this.

So when we see things like that, we try to channel that into our creative energy, and whether that manifests itself in writing an article, or a new book idea, you know, depends on how big the idea is.

AT: This month of course marks the one-year anniversary of the Tohoku earthquake. Is there anything you'd like to share about your experience of the earthquake as it happened?

This sounds really silly but it was a huge shake-up. I mean it literally was a shake and psychologically it was very traumatic for everybody involved, especially the people up North.

But for all of us we were really - in the weeks after the disaster when we were coming to terms with just not only how many people had died and lost their homes, but also the potential that this nuclear accident could harm greater swathes of the country. I mean it was very nerve-racking, it's almost hard to put into words. I'm glad I went through that experience because I think it was very important for everybody to see what happens when natural disasters of this sort strikes.

AT: Finally, do you continue to work as a translator, and what is that like? Also, could you briefly describe the difference between translation and localization?

Yes. I work as a translator, which means I deal with speaking and writing in Japanese every day. I've been studying Japanese ever since I was a kid - 14 or 15 years old, very fortunate that my public high school in Maryland had one of America's then-pilot Japanese programs in a public school, and probably thanks to our proximity to Washington DC. I've been studying it ever since then, majored in it in college, came over here as often as I could, whenever I could scrape money together.

Localization and translation are almost like flip sides of the exact same coin because you can't have localization without translation. Translation is basically the simple art of rendering a Japanese text into English. Localization takes that a step further, by actually polishing the translation, and making sure that it is suitable for the target audience.

In our field, entertainment, the ideal is that the person reading the localized text doesn't even realize it was originally written in the foreign language. Whereas in a translation that's not what the end game is. Translation is about communication, whereas localization is about entertainment, and entertaining the people reading it.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6964080

Highest Paying Careers - Exciting and Rewarding Careers Worth Pursuing

If you think that you have to sacrifice enjoyment and excitement for a top paying job, you've got it all wrong. To be quite honest, some of the highest paying careers in the world are those that are the most rewarding - in more ways than one.

Many people have the wrong notion that having one of the highest paying careers means being cooped up in a corporate office staring at numbers and vice-versa.

Although there are corporate jobs that pay exceedingly well, there are also a great number of wonderful job opportunities that will make you feel like you're not even at work! Want to find out what these opportunities are? Read on!

1) Airline Pilots
A lot of boys (and some girls) grow up wanting to become an airline pilot. However, not a lot of them actually pursue the career. Somewhere along the way, they forego such seemingly distant dreams for something closer to home. Another obstacle is that it's quite expensive to study and train for this type of career.

However, airline pilots have one of the highest paying careers in the world. There are also a multitude of benefits that come with flying a plane. The travel perks for you and your family certainly counts as one of those advantages. It's also easy to map out your career once you start on this path. The higher your rank, the better paid you will be.

2) Podiatrists
A medical career is definitely one of the highest paying careers in the world. However, becoming a doctor or a surgeon takes a whole lot of time and money. Not everyone can spend years studying medicine, although the return on investment is almost guaranteed.
Still, not all branches of medicine are that way. You can opt to become a podiatrist - a doctor who deals with injured feet and ankles. Usually, you must have at least three years of college before you can get into a school of podiatry. Still, it's considerably a shorter term than if you pursue general practice. It might not be a very glamorous occupation, but the pay is good and your hours are usually your own.

3) Accountants
Accountants are also among the highest paid careers out there. While you do have to deal with numbers, it's more about understanding the business rather than real Math equations.
This job is also non-gender specific, which makes it an ideal career prospect for anybody. Not to mention, there is a shortage of certified accountants in the world. If you're good at what you do, companies will run after you and offer you skyrocketing salaries.

Even if you have one of the highest paying careers in the world, keep in mind that not everything is about money. If you're not happy with your job, it won't be long before you wear yourself out. Love what you do and be grateful for what you already have.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/2450894

Instant Online Paycheck Review By Creators Travis Stephenson and Kris McCarty

Travis Stephenson and Kris McCarty are actually upon the edge of releasing their best and newest wealth earning guide labeled Instant Online Paycheck.

Instant Online Paycheckis going to be an excellent in-depth guide showing men and women the correct way to establish extensive opt-in lists on their own. Instant Online Paycheck is without a doubt developed for the beginner that have not to date started to develop a list. The program covers all points of importance. If you haven't yet included a list to your internet marketing business, then it is time to start! Plus Instant Online Paycheck will help you build your list from absolute zero.

Instant Online Paycheck is going to expose a "push button" "auto pilot cash" script which helped a complete newbie to produce $49,306 in only 15 days! The thing is "the money is in the list." Each and every internet marketing guru can tell you that. They all may very well disagree on the subject of which traffic generation is most suitable, PPC or SEO; or probably will contend its simpler to be an affiliate marketer then to build your own goods, or vise versa. But, no online marketing professional is in any time going to disagree that you should build up a list. Just about every professional who has been in business for a while, by some means will likely encourage generating a list.

List generating is without a doubt a process that you absolutely need to be tutored on and simply cannot just wing it. If carried out correctly, acquiring a good list in nearly any kind of niche, is similar to possessing access to an instant online paycheck. It is said that for each opt-in name on your list, you ought to be able to create a minimum of $1 for each name each month.

Travis and Kris, the creators of Instant Online Paycheck, claim that they have stumbled on an remarkable script that can put list building on absolute auto pilot. Additionally, they state that it will work for any person at any kind of level.

Although you may currently possess a list and therefore are actively developing it, this will place your list building tasks on hyper drive! Imagine in a short amount of time growing your list of a few hundred, to a few thousand....to well over 10, thousand! And then why should you quit at that point? Simply allow software conduct its task, and in that respect there will be virtually no stopping it. If this can certainly get you ten leads, it may possibly ensure you get a hundred, thousand subscribers. It merely requires a modest amount of time. Don't forget the thing I pointed out regarding $1 for each and every name phone? Are you able to just imagine in under a year from today, you might be earning $100, thousand Each And Every Month?

Instant Online Paycheck is furthermore intending to be presenting at the very least seven consecutive days of live webinar classes. Just one of the neatest features is the fact that we're going to feature a membership area through which members could very well swap lists amongst each other. So that, as an example, once you have accumulated a list regarding healthy farming, and finally you would like to market a diet offer, you're able to exchange your current list with someone who offers a weight-loss list. In my opinion that is certainly very innovative The training course will be priced around the $47 mark. The members area access as well as list exchange system, is worth that price alone!

Is this system a scam? Read what the creators of Instant Online Paycheck Review [http://newsadstream.com/instant-online-paycheck-review-by-creators-travis-stephenson-and-kris-mccarty/221190/] have to say. Read the interview of why they feel that their program is worth more than what they're asking for it.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/5908285

A Hollow Earth Beneath Our Feet

Whispers and myths of a hollow earth have been with us for a very long time, the earliest references come from ancient people's legends about how and where the human race was born, the Inuit people of Greenland and Northern Canada tell stories of a great land far to the north, where it never gets dark, this place has a mild climate and large lakes that never freeze, where strange animals move in herds, and where birds of many colors fly overhead. A Welsh story writer from the 12th century named Walter Mapes wrote about a prehistoric king of Albion (Britain) named Herla. When King Herla became lost from his soldiers in a great forest he was approached by a dwarf king who took Herla through a tunnel which opened in a sandstone cliff, down into the earth where time ran differently to the world above. Of course both of these accounts can easily be written of as fanciful tales but what has been written about the hollow earth subject in more recent times?

Athanasius Kircher was a German scientific researcher and expert linguist, he lived from 1601 to 1680 and was adept in twelve European and oriental languages, he tried to decipher ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics before the Rosetta stone was discovered in 1799, but unfortunately failed to translate them. He also deeply studied and wrote about China, the tower of Babel, mathematics, cosmology, magnetism and medicine, but the reason he's making an appearance in this article is for his book titled the subterranean world in which he writes about the Earths tides being influenced by a subterranean ocean and vast underground caverns. Athanasius was so interested in the idea of a hollow earth that he once paid a guide to take him up mount Vesuvius and lower him into the volcano's crater, which was dangerously close to erupting, so that he could study it from inside.

Next we have the astronomer and physicist Edmond Halley, who was born on the 8th of November 1656 and is famous for working out the orbit of (his) Halley's comet. He was also deeply intrigued with the hollow earth legends and first suggested his hollow earth theory in 1692, he theorised that the outer shell was roughly 500 miles thick and that there were two inner shells, each shell including our surface has an ozone layer and the spectacular lights of the aurora borealis were the inner ozone seeping through the north and south poles. For Halley his theory also explained why magnetic compass readings went haywire in certain areas, his thinking being that the inner shells gravity was throwing them off.

Now we get to the more interesting and weirder first hand account of admiral Richard E. Byrd. Byrd was a naval officer and his primary duties involved exploring the north and south poles by air. The official accounts of his polar adventures are relatively mundane but from his own personal diary comes an amazing account in which he claims to have flew into a great opening at the north pole where his aeroplane was intercepted by "advanced flying machines" which escorted him to a great city. After being allowed to rest Byrd was interviewed by the senior residents of this city, and during the interview he was told that they were greatly concerned about the work our scientists were carrying out with harnessing the power of the atom, specifically bomb development. Of course admiral Byrd's story has been condemned as false by official sources but of course any government trying to keep such a thing quiet for the psychological benefit of their populace or work force would seek to discredit a witness's testimony such as admiral Richard E. Byrd's who referred to the Arctic as "the land of everlasting mystery".

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/7231254

Book Review - Heaven's Rage by Tiffany Craig Brown

Heaven's Rage is the first novel by Tiffany Craig Brown, a former corporate communications expert and also former managing editor of the Natomas Journal established in the Sacramento area.
Heaven's Rage is the story of a retired helicopter pilot named Richard Tate who is found murdered in his apartment; the most likely suspects being four women from Tate's past -- three ex-wives and his college lover. Homicide Detective Ian Buchanan must interview all four women to determine who killed Tate, however the more he learns, the more he sympathizes for the women and not the victim!
Tiffany Craig Brown initially pulls readers in by making us privy to the gruesome details of Tate's crime scene, as well as presenting us with a clue left behind at the crime scene in the form of mysterious vomit that is presumed to come from someone other than the victim. I must admit I was truly intrigued by the vomit and where it originated from! As we read the first few chapters, it is evident that Brown definitely performed thorough research concerning the police procedural methods, which are artfully executed.

Upon finishing up with the initial crime scene portion, Heaven's Rage is then split up into four main sections detailing each horrendous relationship Richard Tate had with the women in his life. We learn that Tate (appropriately nicknamed Dick by the way) is a disturbed man with severe issues stemming from his childhood and just like Detective Buchanan, we are appalled by Tate and of the way he treats each woman. I found myself feeling genuinely happy that someone murdered him for the novel's sake, and became emotional in sympathizing with each suspect!

The flow of the novel is superb because it's got the "I-can't-put-it-down!" quality, with perfect transitions and breaks in all the right spots. As a reader, the pleasure and value of Heaven's Rage is being able to identify with each of Tate's "victims", and we find that we love to hate Richard "Dick" Tate along with trying to identify the murderer.

Being an avid murder mystery reader, I believe Heaven's Rage may have been more impacting had there been more concrete clues scattered throughout the novel in regards to determining the murderer's identity. The largest draw and allure of crime and mystery novels is being able to apply the author's clues to solving the murderer's identity before it is revealed to us. Although the murderer's identity is indeed surprising, Heaven's Rage does not provide readers with enough clues to solve the mystery on their own.

I personally enjoyed Heaven's Rage because of my familiarity with the military lifestyle (being a military brat myself) and having lived in the locations featured in the novel including Colorado Springs, San Diego, and Coronado. On the other hand, you won't need to be familiar with the above attributes to enjoy Heaven's Rage and better yet, it will appeal to all genres of readers! Heaven's Rage is evidence that Tiffany Craig Brown has amazing talent hands-down, and as a reader you won't be disappointed! No matter what your taste, you'll gain something from Heaven's Rage whether it be satisfaction from revenge or even being able to relate to nasty divorce and custody battles, among many other real-life experiences this novel brings to light.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/4780214

Inside the Situation Room on 9-11 (Part 1 of 3)

I'll never forget that moment of sheer terror. That split second where I knew that I might not make it out of there alive. When I got to work at 7:00 that fall morning it was a beautiful day; how could I have known that in a couple of hours the world would be a profoundly different place, and that I would leave work to a city so quiet that I would hear only the sound of my footsteps that afternoon? I was 22 years old and spent September 11, 2001, in the White House Situation Room. For five years I have tried to figure out both why I stayed that day, and why I decided to leave less than five months later.

I considered Washington, DC, to be home by the time I graduated from the George Washington University in 2000. I had a degree in International Affairs and I wanted to change the world. My sister knew someone who worked at the National Security Council and told him about me. When he found out I had been an intern at the U.S. Department of State during college, he passed along my resume to Tim, the Director of the Records Management Office, who was looking for someone to fill a soon-to-be open position. After speaking to the man who was to become my boss, I made arrangements to travel to DC for an interview.

The Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB), known to many as the Old Executive Office Building, is a huge grey building that looks like it came straight from Europe. Located at 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, it is part of the White House complex, and I had been there once before while an intern at State. I arrived at the interview and met with Tim, the director of the Records Management Office at the NSC. We had a brief interview where I was reminded that I was not going to be in a position to make policy, but I would basically know everything that was going on in the NSC. Records Management is the office that keeps the NSC running. As a Staff Information Assistant, I was to be one of the people that made sure all the paperwork got to the people who needed to it, when they needed it. It sounded like an opportunity to see how the government worked at the highest levels, and it was a job I couldn't pass up.

I had lunch with Greg, the man I was going to replace, and we had an interesting discussion about whether U.S. foreign policy is proactive or reactive, and though I thought I knew the answer, he was unwilling to tell me if I was right or wrong. I'd have to find out for myself. (I said then and I say now it's reactive.) After lunch he wanted to show me around a little bit, and we went back to the EEOB. After a brief stop back at the office, we went down the elevator and out a set of electric double doors. A quick left turn and there it was: the West Wing. I was awed and couldn't think of anything to say. We walked across West Executive Avenue, now used as a parking lot, walked through the doors into the West Wing, down a few stairs, and came to a wooden door with a simple gold plaque. It read "White House Situation Room." He punched a code into the keypad on the wall, the door lock clicked open, and we entered. It was smaller than I expected, but nonetheless an incredible place to be. I took a quick look around and was introduced to Chuck, the Staff Information Assistant who was on duty in the Sit Room at what was called "West Wing Desk" (WWD). Before the NSC's Executive Secretariat was moved to an office in the West Wing adjacent to the Sit Room, the only NSC representative in the West Wing other than the National Security Advisor was the person in the Sit Room. WWD was situated right outside the office of the Director of the White House Situation Room, and was responsible for ensuring the flow of information to the President, National Security Advisor, and other officials both in the White House and throughout the federal government. I was hooked, and couldn't wait to start working.

Several months later, after an FBI background investigation, I received my security clearances and was ready to begin. November 20, 2000, two months before the end of the Clinton presidency, I walked through the White House gates as an NSC staff member. It was an interesting time to start, since all of the Clinton records had to be shipped to the National Archives and we had to start transitioning to a new Administration, but we still didn't know whom the next President would be. I remember thinking that it wouldn't really make a difference; he'd probably serve one term and be forgotten after eight years of Clinton. As we all know, the U.S. Supreme Court declared George W. Bush President after a bitter legal battle over Florida ballots. Although I "served at the pleasure of the President," I wasn't worried about losing my job because I was a career appointee, not a political appointee. People in my position didn't change with the Administration, we weren't high enough on the ladder for anyone to think about, and there were rules against a lot of political participation by us, anyway.

I spent several months working out of the Records Management office in the EEOB, until around March 2001, when I started to get trained at West Wing Desk. We were kept on a rotating schedule, so I would spend a week or two in the office, and then a week in the Sit Room. It got pretty hectic there at times, especially when there was a big meeting about to take place but the documents that all the participants weren't ready until just before the meeting was scheduled to start. The person at WWD always got blamed when something went wrong, and was usually ignored when he pulled everything together at the last minute, despite the lack of help from those who could. A break from WWD duty was always welcome, but being in the Sit Room was always more exciting that being in the EEOB.
During the summer of 2001, I switched from the day shift to the morning shift, which meant that instead of being at work at 12:30 pm, I'd have to be there at 7:00 am. It was earlier than I like to be anywhere, but it made my commute a lot easier, and when I had to stay late I could still get home without it taking over an hour. It was pure coincidence that led to my being in the Sit Room on September 11th; it just happened to be my week at WWD.

As I did every morning at WWD, I arrived in the Sit Room around 6:50 am and turned on my computer. While waiting for it to boot up, I reviewed the "Due List," a daily checklist from the NSC Executive Secretariat (Exec Sec) of items we needed to be on the lookout for, such as reports to Congress, correspondence with foreign leaders and materials for upcoming NSC-led meetings. The "Night Notes" email was the first one I read once my computer was running; it was sent nightly to the Records staff by whoever was at WWD so that the morning staffer knew where key documents were in the West Wing, and had additional notes of items to watch for. Nothing exciting, so I took care of some other work and settled in for another day at the White House.

It began as a simple statement from the Senior Duty Officer (SDO) in the operations center of the Sit Room. "We have a report of a plane hitting the World Trade Center in New York." That was all we knew. I remember thinking that it would be really hard to miss those buildings, but how much damage could a small plane do? I didn't yet know that it was a commercial airliner, and I'd heard it was a private plane that had some sort of problem and couldn't avoid a collision or pilot error. That all changed when moments later I heard the SDO say that FAA was reporting a possible hijacking. Apparently a pilot had hit a button on the airplane's stick that alerted authorities to a takeover of the plane, and that report was passed to us. The NSC senior staff was in the middle of their daily meeting in the Sit Room conference room when the news came in, and one of the duty officers informed Dr. Rice and the others what was happening. Since CNN was always on in the Sit Room, the senior staffers briefly moved from the conference room to the operations center to watch, but there was little information at that point, so they returned to the conference room and quickly concluded their meeting.

Around this time, Raymond came over from the Records office in the EEOB to bring me the latest documents to process and send through the chain in the West Wing, likely to land on the desk of Dr. Rice or the President in the near future, and so that I could give him some work to do in the office. We briefly stepped out onto West Executive Avenue so I could have a smoke and tell him about what was going on in New York. While we talked I couldn't stop thinking about how many people could be killed if someone successfully attacked the Twin Towers. 5,000? 10,000? It's hard to even imagine that number of people dying at the same time, but seemed like a possibility. A few minutes later Raymond and I parted ways, and I returned to the Sit Room to find Dr. Rice and most of the senior staff standing in the operations center watching the news. Less than a minute later it got much, much worse.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/2172707

The Phoenix Lights - Debunking the Debunkers

On March 13th 1997, an extraordinary event occurred across the state of Arizona that has become the subject of great debate in the UFO community. Hundreds, and perhaps thousands of witnesses from all walks of life reported seeing a large V-shaped craft, over a mile across with unusual lights, travel slowly and silently by at a very low altitude. Some witnesses who reported being directly underneath it as it passed, said it drifted right over the housetops, so close it seemed "they could almost touch it." Witness accounts suggest that at least one unknown craft and possibly others passed directly over Phoenix and penetrated through Sky Harbor airspace, before drifting off to the south towards Tucson. At least one air traffic controller at Sky Harbor Airport admitted in a televised news interview that he saw the lights from the tower using binoculars, but did not see anything on radar.

Skeptics and debunkers dismiss the event as flares or a host of other manmade or natural explanations while thousands of witnesses insist that what they saw cannot be explained in any known terms. There are many facts, photos, witness accounts and notable circumstances that are attached to the event and similar events that have occurred all over the world that are largely ignored by the media and completely ignored by a few staunch skeptics and debunkers who get way more media attention than they deserve. First and very importantly, to avoid confusion we need to classify the Phoenix Lights Phenomenon into two categories:

LIGHTS ON MOVING CRAFT: These are the lights associated with the March 13th event (shortly after 8pm) that appeared to be fixed to a large V-shaped or triangular shaped craft. There are varying witness descriptions of different light arrays, patterns and number of lights which could suggest the possibility of multiple craft or a singular craft that changed as it flew across the Arizona skies. Witnesses all unanimously agree that the craft, or multiple craft, were completely silent and flew very close to the ground. One craft was over a mile wide according to hundreds of documented witness accounts.

ORBS: These are luminescent amber orbs that randomly appear individually, in pairs or groups. They can appear together in rigid formation or separated by miles. These orbs defy explanation and are the variety I personally observed on November 21st 2005 (read about my sighting). They do not flicker or emit any smoke trails and remain perfectly fixed in their position relative to each other and to the ground. Dr. Lynne Kitei, a well-respected Phoenix physician and key witness to the Phoenix Lights, personally observed these anomalous lights very close to her mountainside home in 1995. She had the unique opportunity to observe a trio of orbs in close proximity (less than 200 feet away) and described them as balls of amber light approximately three to six feet across. They did not glare, emit any beam of light or illuminate their adjacent surroundings. She could not identify what they were, but managed to capture them in a photograph. She said they dimmed out one by one "as if on a dimmer switch."
The orbs are a separate phenomenon from what happened on March 13th 1997, which by all accounts was a massive UFO flyover. The orbs are fiercely argued to be flares dropped by the military due to their similar appearance. Skeptics have thrown out many explanations, none of which have been substantiated by any facts or witness accounts.

FLARE THEORY: By far the most common theory and the official theory given by the local Phoenix military. First let me point out that I am fully aware of the Barry Goldwater test range. I know where it is in proximity to Phoenix and I have an excellent understanding of the activity that takes place there based on numerous sources including military personnel. I know what flares look like, both from personal observation and analysis of video footage and photos, and I have personally spoken to military personnel who work with flares on a daily basis, including a highly qualified pyrotechnic expert. I don't dispute that the military drops flares over the Barry Goldwater Range and that pilots often jettison their remaining flares before returning to base. I also agree that some, not all of the reported sightings of strange lights and a number of photos and videos that have been circulated around were indeed flares.
The big question here is; If flares are routinely dropped over the Barry Goldwater Range and they have done so since 1941, wouldn't it be logical to assume that most people in Phoenix are used to seeing them? What would prompt thousands of people to suddenly call into local newspapers, police stations, news stations, radio stations and Luke Air Force base, all on the same night and all around the same time? It is plainly obvious that many people saw something very strange, not something as mundane and routine as a flare drop, and felt compelled to report it and find out what it was.

I challenge the debunkers who insist that ALL Phoenix Lights reports were actually flares, to consider looking at the real facts rather than dismiss the hundreds of verifiable witness reports, photos and investigative evidence out of hand. If there is conclusive evidence that can explain everything away and prove it was only flares, bring it to the table and let the public see it! The flare theory is a nice convenient way to explain glowing lights in the sky and seems like the most logical explanation for the Phoenix Lights until you consider all of the reasons why the theory doesn't work:

FLARE THEORY DOESN'T FIT WITNESS TESTIMONIES: First you have to acknowledge the staggering number of witnesses that were out on the evening of March 13th 1997 hoping to catch a glimpse of the Halle-Bopp comet. It was a perfectly clear night and thousands of people from all walks of life, including doctors, police officers, little league coaches with their kids, people jogging, drivers on the road, all kinds of people were going about their business when suddenly, out of the blue, they look up and see an enormous V-shaped, semi-transparent craft with an array of lights, travel slowly and silently by, very low to the ground. Some witnesses said it went directly over their heads.
The shear number of matching witness accounts eliminates any possibility of a hoax, unless of course you are going to suggest that thousands of people got together and decided to make up some phony story, not only in Phoenix, but other countries that have reported similar phenomenon, just so they could all have a good laugh. Frankly, I would sooner believe that we were being visited from beyond than buy into a mass hoax conspiracy theory. If there were only a handful of reports coming from a small group of people partying and drinking out in the desert, I would surely and quickly dismiss the whole thing.

According to witness accounts at least one large V-shaped craft and possibly other triangular craft, flew across the entire state of Arizona, starting from Paulden all the way down to Phoenix and Tucson. The timeline of verifiable reports suggest that something did in fact travel across the entire state, which brings me to my first argument against the coveted flare theory; Flares don't travel hundreds of miles, and witnesses in southern and northern Arizona couldn't possibly see flares over the Barry Goldwater Range! Also, witnesses described a large semi-transparent craft with strange looking lights, not flares with smoke trails. Some witnesses were directly underneath as the craft flew over and swear that it was anything but flares!

DON'T INSULT THE WITNESSES' INTELLIGENCE! Flare theorists seem to believe that witnesses can't tell the difference between flares and something that by all accounts was completely out of this world. Many of the witnesses who came forward included active military personnel who work with flares on a daily basis. They were very adamant that what they saw were not flares! You don't have to be a flare expert to tell what they look like. The burning magnesium from the flares illuminates the rising smoke above. They flicker and move about as they fall to the ground. The military staged a flare demo in 2000 hoping to convince everyone that what they actually saw were flares. The demonstration totally backfired as it gave witnesses an opportunity to make a fair comparison and conclude that there was no similarity at all to what they saw.

FLARES DON'T STAY FIXED IN ONE POSITION RELATIVE TO THE GROUND AND EACH OTHER: There has been extensive analysis of videos submitted by witnesses that clearly shows that the anomalous orbs don't budge at all. Mike Tanner, a witness and key investigator, viewed a series of light formations and at one point used a spotter scope to zoom in on one of the orbs. The orb faded in and out over twenty minutes without ever moving as it stayed fixed within the scope. Another military witness claims that he observed similar orbs from his home near Luke AFB. The orbs stayed fixed in one position for over twenty minutes. He says they definitely were not flares and he works with flares on a daily basis!

FLARES ARE NEVER DROPPED OVER POPULATED AREAS OR INDIAN RESERVATIONS: Illumination flares are large metal cylinders filled with a magnesium based pyrotechnic composition. They are dropped over test ranges, military bases and other areas where military operations take place. Dropping flares, or any objects for that matter, over populated areas and Indian reservations is an FAA violation and prohibited due to possible injury to civilians, damage to property and ground fires.
NEW FLARE TECHNOLOGY? Someone once suggested that these flares are of a new type not yet known to the public. If this were true we would surely know about it by now, over a decade later. Illumination flares are used to help troops see better at night and spoofing flares are used to divert heat seeking missiles. There is nothing top-secret about flares or their use, even a new type that can somehow appear, then disappear, then re-appear in the same spot and stay fixed in one position. If the military had this kind of technology, why wouldn't they just admit it to the public and put an end to all of the endless speculation? Why wouldn't they have done so back in 2000 when they staged their flare demonstration?

I PERSONALLY WITNESSED THESE MYSTERIOUS ORBS: On November 21st 2005, I observed two amber orbs in a side-by-side formation from a Boeing 737 departing Sky Harbor Airport. They did not appear to be aircraft, flares or any natural phenomenon. What is most significant is that they appeared in an identical, side-by-side formation in two different locations. The first location was in front of the Estrella Mountain Range directly over the north end of the Gila Bend Indian Reservation. The second location was northwest of Glendale. I had an incredible bird's-eye view on a perfectly clear night and I could easily see the horizon and topography (read about my sighting). They appeared in the same side-by-side formation, rigidly fixed in space and they were very bright and distinct from all other light sources. There were no visible military operations at either of the two locations, no visible aircraft deploying them and no sign of them being fired up into the air. The military would not deploy them over populated areas or Indian reservations.

LARGE MILITARY BLIMP or TOP SECRET MILITARY PROJECT: Another common theory is that experimental government aircraft are responsible for the Phoenix Lights. Supporters of this theory believe that a very large, silent surveillance blimp or top-secret aircraft flew over Arizona and that diversionary flares were dropped by the military in an attempt to divert the attention of whoever was out on that clear evening gazing at Halle-Bopp comet.

Some skeptics may be referring to the Ascender project, which is not top-secret at all. The Ascender is a semi-autonomous V-shaped blimp that can hover in near space to perform high-altitude reconnaissance and relay battlefield communications. In 2004 (seven years after the event took place), John Powell, founder of JP Aerospace, told MSNBC.com "The full-size station in our grand vision is 2 miles across, but that's down the road a bit." No such blimp existed in 1997 and the largest size to date is no bigger than a passenger jet, much smaller than witnesses described. It is important to note that a mile-wide blimp can only be deployed at sub-orbital altitudes where the air is extremely thin and the craft is virtually weightless. At lower altitudes, it would collapse under its own weight. You could never build such an enormous aircraft structure at ground level, let alone one that could fly extremely slow under its own power without making even the slightest noise.

When considering this implausible theory, one must also consider many obvious questions; Are we supposed to believe the military would fly an enormous blimp a mile or so across (the enormous size was a consistent descriptive in hundreds of eye-witness reports) right over the city at extremely low altitude, endangering millions of citizens on the ground and in the air, rather than fly a course somewhere over the thousands of square miles of uninhabited desert surrounding Phoenix, out of the public eye? If this was indeed a "top secret" blimp, why would they fly it at low altitude right over a city in full public view? If they flew it over uninhabited areas they wouldn't have to bother with diversionary flares. Anyway, you could never fly a blimp of this size with accuracy at low altitude as it would by highly susceptible to winds and convective currents.

Every major airport in the country that has scheduled airline service (including Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport) is surrounded by Class-B airspace, a protective zone that extends 30 miles out from the center of the airport. Large airports are typically surrounded by many smaller airports that are in relative close proximity, so the airspace is very busy. ATC constantly communicates with all pilots entering their airspace, assigning specific routes and altitudes in order to maintain safe separation between aircraft. All pilots entering Class-B airspace are issued a 4-digit transponder code for identification and their aircraft must be equipped with a Transponder that has altitude reporting so that ATC can accurately monitor the aircraft's position. The only exceptions are crop dusters and aircraft that are ferried to repair facilities, but special arrangements must be made in advance. The point is that no aircraft, including military aircraft, can enter Class-B airspace without communication and clearance from the airspace controller. Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR #191 of Part 91) require all aircraft to fly at an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal distance of less than 2,000 feet in congested areas. In other words, pilots must maintain minimum safe altitudes and obstacle clearance when flying over a densely populated area. They are not allowed to fly directly over housetops.

The bottom line is, the craft that flew over Phoenix on March 13th severely violated Class-B airspace when it entered without communication and clearance from ATC and flew right across the final approach course of Sky Harbor Airport, one of the busiest airports in the country. It also went undetected by radar which completely kills the blimp idea and all other conventional aircraft for that matter. If it was an aircraft that flew over Phoenix in 1997, top-secret or not, the public would have known about it a long time ago. The aircraft controller who was interviewed by a local news station would certainly have admitted that it was military in nature, but he didn't. He said that he could see the lights, but he didn't see anything on radar and had no idea what it was.

It is absurd to suggest that the military would intentionally fly an enormous aircraft through Sky Harbor airspace, without communication or clearance, violate minimum safe altitude requirements, publicly display their top-secret, invisible, mile-wide behemoth and then completely deny its existence. What happened to the mile-wide aircraft after the fact? How could the military hide such an enormous aircraft (or make it invisible) and how come we don't know about its existence 10+ years after the fact?

Finally, what's so top secret about an enormous blimp compared to our stealth technology, which is already public knowledge? The X45, X47, Scramjet and DARPA'S Slingshot projects as well as other cutting edge projects are already in the public domain. While some of the capabilities of these new aircraft and weapon systems are still classified, they are certainly visible to the public.

CESSNAS FLYING IN FORMATION (STAGED HOAX): After the Phoenix Lights event, a young man came forward and claimed that he viewed the Phoenix Lights using a Celestron Telescope and saw they were a fleet of Cessnas flying in formation. Despite thousands of witness reports to the contrary, local media focused on this singular report. First of all, to suggest that you could follow a moving Cessna with a Telescope is ridiculous. I personally own a telescope and there is no way you could follow a moving aircraft and focus in on it, especially at night. Based on this statement alone I would seriously question anything this witness had to say.

First you have to convince me that a group of pilots would be stupid enough and brazen enough to think they could pull off such an elaborate hoax without being caught. Every pilot knows that penetrating Class-B airspace (a 30-mile protective veil that surrounds every major airport in the country) without a proper ATC clearance, would get them into serious trouble. There is no way a fleet of Cessnas could fly silently, even with the engines running at idle, and avoid radar detection.
A fleet of aircraft entering Class-B airspace without communication or clearance would be considered a serious threat and they most certainly would have been forced down by military pilots. Once on the ground the perpetrators would be arrested, heavily fined and face possible prosecution and prison time. The FAA would permanently suspend their licenses due to the magnitude of the crime. They would be thrashed by the media and lynched by the public.

Why would any pilot risk everything, believing that they could successfully pull off such an elaborate hoax, get away with it, go home, watch the 10'oclock news and have a nice laugh? Nobody ever got caught and nobody ever came forward to say "we did it." Private pilots would never take such a risk, commercial pilots would never risk their flying careers, and airline pilots are constantly monitored by ATC. They would never attempt such a thing especially with a plane loaded with passengers. Obviously this guy concocted the entire story to get his mug on the six o'clock news!
HELICOPTERS IN FORMATION: All helicopters make noise. This theory doesn't fit with the thousands of witness reports claiming that the craft was totally silent and most people are smart enough to tell what a helicopter looks like. For these reasons and all of the reasons described in the Cessna theory, this simply doesn't fly!

STEALTH B2 BOMBER FLYOVER: Thousands of witnesses claim that they saw an enormous V-shaped craft over a mile wide, semi-transparent, with an array of large luminous lights attached. The stealth bomber is tiny by comparison. What is most significant is that every witness reported that the enormous craft was totally silent. This kills the stealth bomber theory. Stealth means that the aircraft is radar evasive, not sound evasive. It is anything but quiet. The military would never violate Class B airspace by entering without an ATC clearance and air traffic controllers would never vector an aircraft across the final approach course of a busy airport, especially at a dangerously low altitude! We interviewed a witness for the Phoenix Lights Documentary who says that she saw a stealth bomber fly over her house during the World Series, but it didn't look anything like what she saw fly directly over her head on March 13th.

MILITARY HOAX: The military would never intentionally stage a UFO hoax. The last thing they want to deal with is placating public concerns. Why would military pilots attempt to stage such a hoax and seriously risk losing their coveted flying privileges they worked so hard to obtain? The upper military brass would not take such an action lightly and the consequences are far too severe to justify an elaborate hoax just for laughs.

It is interesting to note that in one case, a witness who called in to Luke Air Force Base to report strange lights was told that the phones were ringing off the hook. The woman who answered the phone admitted that she did not have any information at that time and suggested the witness call back the next day. Upon calling the next day, the same witness reported that a different person answered, and with a hostile attitude, denied that there were any reports at all. Other witnesses reported the same indifferent, hostile attitude and complete denial of any unusual activity.

As a final note, the government and military never denied the 8pm event took place and they never claimed that the 8pm event was flares. What they officially reported to the public was the following statement: "At no time was there ever a threat to our national security." There is a great likelihood that flares were dropped around 10pm, possibly as a diversionary tactic to confuse the facts and that many (not all) reported sightings at that time were of the flare drop.

ATMOSPHERIC PHENOMENON: The skies over Phoenix were perfectly clear and there is no known atmospheric phenomenon that could have manifested or looked anything like what witnesses saw. Auroras generally only appear near the Earth's north and south poles. You are not likely to see them in the Arizona skies.

BALL LIGHTNING: We interviewed Robert Golka for the Phoenix Lights Documentary. He never made it into the final cut as we were desperate to reduce the running time down from 3+ hours to a nominal 84 minutes. He is one of the world's foremost experts on ball lightning and famous for building the world's largest Tesla coil at Wendover Air Force Base in 1973. He is one of the few people on the planet to create ball lightning in a lab environment. According to his expert testimony, ball lightning is a rare phenomenon that can occur near the ground and at higher altitudes and has on very rare occasions been observed by passengers in aircraft. Ball lightning requires a source with strong electromagnetic fields such as that present in storm clouds. It can burst out from high electromagnetic fields present in the Earth as well. The night the Phoenix Lights event occurred was totally clear with no storm clouds present. In his opinion ball lightning could not occur on such a clear night and would never manifest into an array of lights and travel low and slow, in formation, across the state of Arizona. The phenomenon does not match witness accounts.

SWAMP GAS: A completely ridiculous theory at best. There are no swamps anywhere in Phoenix or the state of Arizona for that matter and swamp gas does not look like what thousands of witnesses described.

METEORS: Meteors streak across the sky at very high altitude and burn up from the intense friction of passing through the Earth's atmosphere at hypersonic speeds. Whatever doesn't burn up falls to the ground and is referred to as a meteorite. Meteors don't fly low and slow in perfect formation or resemble a large V-shaped craft. I never heard any witness say; "It looked like a meteor!"

MASS HALLUCINATION: I don't believe in the concept of mass hallucination at all. To my knowledge this is an unproven concept with no verifiable historical evidence whatsoever. It is completely ridiculous to suggest that thousands of people stopped what they were doing, looked up in the sky and saw something that wasn't there. Did somebody spike the Phoenix aqueducts with LSD? It is amazing anyone would sooner believe in such nonsense rather than believe witnesses actually saw something.

MASS HOAX CONSPIRACY: The mass hoax theory is another outrageous concept completely unfounded by any facts. What would motivate thousands of people from all walks of life to get together and secretly conjure up such a hoax? How would such a massive hoax be kept secret? How come nobody ever came forward to say, "we all made it up it was just a joke? I believe the witnesses actually saw something extraordinary. You can't dismiss the testimony of hundreds of witnesses with matching descriptions.

WEATHER BALLOONS: The weather balloon theory is often thrown out by many skeptics as a convenient explanation for UFOs. While this may be a valid explanation for some daytime sightings, it does not fit as a possible explanation for the Phoenix Lights. Weather balloons are not illuminated and cannot be seen at night, except for a flashing beacon. For this reason they are never released in populated areas where there is a high density of airport traffic, such as the airspace over Phoenix, because they are hazardous to aircraft. There are several types of weather balloons used for different purposes, but most are filled with hydrogen or helium gas and carry an instrument called a radiosonde that measures atmospheric pressure, air temperature and relative humidity. Weather balloons do not travel laterally close to the ground. They rise an average of 1000 feet per minute and burst at an altitude of around 100,000 feet where the atmospheric pressure is one percent the pressure at sea-level. The radiosonde deploys a small parachute and falls gently to the ground. It is absurd to suggest that a fleet of weather balloons were released on the night of March 13th and flew in a perfect v-shaped formation, at low altitude across the entire state of Arizona!

FINAL CONCLUSIONS: Once you rule out all possible natural and man-made explanations for the Phoenix Lights there is only one explanation that, despite what the debunkers say, cannot be conclusively ruled out; Perhaps, WE ARE being visited by our cosmic neighbors, stopping by to check us out! If you consider that the universe is full of life, we are just another race of beings - nothing special. Other more advanced species of life could certainly observe us just as we observe most of the life forms on this planet.

Some people argue that it is impossible for anyone to travel the vast distances in space and come to our remote planet. The scientific minds insist that you can't travel anywhere near the speed of light and that it would take lifetimes to reach our closest neighboring stars. While this seems like a valid point, the truth is, as far as space travel goes, we are like infants taking our first steps. Our first manned space flight was in 1961, which is only a blip in human history. To date, we have only traveled to the moon and sent out a few probes. That hardly qualifies us as "space travelers." Perhaps our ET friends are traveling inter-dimensionally, intra-dimensionally or bending space and time by generating high-level gravitational fields. Physical beings may not be able to travel at light speed, but what about light beings? Who knows what short cuts may exist out there that we haven't discovered yet?
I believe Earth is a micro-cosmic example of the diversity of life in the universe. Life flourishes everywhere on the surface of our planet, even in environments that would be lethal to humans. Go to the highest, deepest, coldest and hottest places on Earth, even solid rock, and you will find life forms, some as big as whales and others far too small to be seen with the naked eye.

Considering the trillions of planets in our own galaxy, the hundreds of billions of galaxies in the universe and how rugged, diverse and adaptive life is, there is virtually no scientific or logical probability that we are alone. In fact, there could be civilizations out there millions or even billions of years ahead of us! Is it possible that Earth has been, and continues to be, visited by extraterrestrial beings? The answer to this question is; Of course it's possible, because there is no way to prove otherwise! We don't know who is really out there or what their capabilities are and that is an indisputable fact! ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE! It's not crazy to be open minded about such things, what is crazy is proclaiming something doesn't exist without having even the slightest thread of evidence to prove it. It's time for us to stop pretending we are the be-all, end-all "masters of the universe" and accept the obvious probability that we are not alone. For many people seeing is believing, but until we have open contact, there's nothing wrong with keeping an open mind.

For me, the truth that ETs visit Earth is a no-brainer and the argument of whether or not they exist has grown very old. The bigger and more important questions are the "what if" questions concerning open contact and the possible benefits to mankind:
  • Huge advances in technology and energy solutions that would help heal our planet.
  • Huge advances in medicine.
  • Access to a wealth of knowledge about the universe, other worlds, man's true roots and perhaps a greater understanding of God.
  • Evolution to a more spiritually enlightened society where war and violence is virtually eliminated.
The potential benefits are far more reaching than anyone of us can imagine. The big question we should be asking is, how will mankind transition from what it is today to a highly spiritual and peaceful race, with total openness and integration into a vast cosmic society? The transformation will be challenging and I believe it is a process that every civilization must face at some point in its evolution.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/2450934

Who Keeps Air Ambulance Flights Safe?

For a moment, imagine the worst. A second of inattention causes your car to veer out of control, overturn and crash. In an instant, your entire world is at risk - your spouse, your children, your life.
The good news is that an entire network of professionals is standing by to help you and your family.
The instant a bystander calls 911 the network is activated.

A 911 dispatcher calls the closest ambulance service and dispatches them to your accident scene. Almost simultaneously, the same dispatcher calls a flight communications specialist and requests an air ambulance helicopter be put on standby.

Once the ground Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and paramedics arrive at your accident scene and assess your injuries, a determination is made as to whether or not a helicopter is needed. If one is needed, the 911 dispatcher and flight communication specialist dispatch a local fire department to set-up a landing zone for the inbound air ambulance helicopter.

The local fire department arrives quickly and assesses the best place to land a helicopter. Sometimes the highway is shut down to accommodate the inbound helicopter. Sometimes the helicopter is landed in a nearby ball field or suitable large open field.

The fire department talks directly to the inbound flight crews and advises them of any hazards or obstacles they are unable to identify on the ground.

At the same time, a lot of other very important things are happening. EMTs and paramedics assess and treat your family's injuries, as well as prepare you and your family for helicopter transport. The fire department is sets up and secures a safe and suitable helicopter landing zone. 911 dispatchers and flight communication specialists notify and coordinate with local trauma centers. A determination will ultimately be made by the flight crew as to where the patient's injuries can best be taken care of.
And of course, at the same time and air ambulance helicopter is in route to your accident scene.
On the surface it may seem as though the pilot, nurse and paramedic on board the aircraft are the people who keep air ambulance flights safe.

But the reality is that safe air ambulance flights require the entire network of professionals behind-the-scenes as well. This network directly contributes to the safety of the air ambulance flight crew.
This network of professionals includes:

EMTs, paramedics, 911 dispatchers, flight communication specialists, aircraft mechanics, pilots, nurses, doctors, specialty transport teams, firefighters, landing zone officers, hospital security, volunteers and first responders.

Want more information about how to launch an air ambulance career? Sign up for our Crew Glue newsletter and free e-book here.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6636750

Why Is Reading a Key to Student Success?

Statistics indicate that only about one in four Americans read a book per year. The one greatest deficiency employers note in their employees is poor reading and writing skills, and companies spend billions each year on remedial courses for workers. J. C. Penney stated, "One of the saddest mistakes I made in years gone by was my utter neglect of reading." Abigail Van Buren said, "If I could give young people only one piece of advice, it would be read, read, read!"

Back in the day when books were less common and more expensive, the great preacher, Spurgeon, urged people to buy only the best most profitable books-those that would do the reader the most good. Locke follows up on that challenge with his statement that "reading furnishes the mind only with materials of knowledge; it is thinking that makes what we read our own."

Nowadays in Western society some formal education is available for most of the young, and, where it is available, of course it should be enjoyed. However, the crucial value of reading cannot be over-emphasized. Dozens of famous and very productive individuals became successful largely through reading.

It is not secret that Samuel Langhorne Clemens (Mark Twain) left school at the age of thirteen for a learning pilgrimage which included stints as a delivery boy, grocery clerk, blacksmith's helper, typesetter, and river boat pilot. He became one of the most renowned writers in American history.
Abraham Lincoln failed twice in business before he reached the age of twenty-five, had a nervous breakdown and failed in seeking public office eight times before being elected the sixteenth president of the United States. In spite of the odds against him, Lincoln was a self-educated lawyer with not even a year of formal schooling. He is said to have walked for miles in pursuit of books, and, although he couldn't avail himself of multitudes of books, he set out to thoroughly understand everything he did read.

Research establishes that almost four million children in the United Kingdom do not even own a book. This causes concern that the rate of children growing up without books is rising, not falling. Youngsters from families of a lower economic level are even more likely to miss out. A recent report by the National Literacy Trust reported in a survey of 18,000 youngsters that almost a third - 3.8 million - do not have books of their own. And the figure has increased from seven years ago, the last time the poll was conducted, when it stood at one in ten.

These statistics also reveal that boys are more likely to be without books than girls, and children eligible for free school meals - a measure of poverty - are more likely to not own a book. The findings, not unsurprisingly, indicate that children who do own books are more likely to enjoy reading, read more books and read more frequently. They are also more likely to perform better at school. Just 7.6 percent of pupils who possess books of their own are reading below the expected level, against 19 percent of those that do not own books. This reflects cause for great concern. Researchers also concluded that 75% of children who read nine or more books a month read above the level expected of them, compared with 28.6% of those who read no books in a month. We must make good books available to our children. Then we must get our children reading by giving them books that will hook their interests. The statistics are almost guaranteed to be no better in the United States.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/7334315

Thứ Năm, 17 tháng 1, 2013

First Steps to Becoming an Oracle Database Administrator

So you think you want to be an Oracle DBA?   Well, first of all, let's examine the reality of the profession...

Yes, the salaries for a seasoned Oracle DBA can be very attractive.  This has advantages and disadvantages for the DBA.  24X7 on-call duty is the norm, getting calls during vacation, weddings, baptisms, surgery, etcetera, is to be expected.  If the DBA is saavy and automates much of their job, they had better find other ways to *visibly* add value to the company, or they will be out of a job.
On the upside, the profession is always changing and always challenging, and that, for many keeps it from ever being boring.  The salary can be very good for an experienced database administrator with specialized skills and a degree (six figures), and even better, leadership/management credentials and experience.

A database administrator is not just a mechanic who keeps the database engine tuned and running.  She is involved with capacity planning, which has a financial impact for the company.  In many cases the DBA has a lot of direct customer contact if the company manages other companies data in anyway, and thus has a huge role in the relationship the company has with it's customers.  The DBA is responsible for safe-guarding the security and integrity of enterprise data.  Negligence on the part of the DBA can tank a healthy company very quickly.

Ok, ready to get started?  If you have finished school and Computer Science was not your degree, it's still possible to break into the field. I have a masters in animal physiology, and started studying Oracle because when I took over the environmental data management program at McNeese State University (mumble) years ago, the budget I inherited did not Here are some initial steps:

First, if possible, position yourself in your present job where you will have an opportunity to work with the current DBA(s), or set up a small database environment from scratch.  Perhaps you can propose a small project that won't generate so much data (at least at the outset) that a lot of extra, expensive hardware will be needed.  If you propose a pilot project, you may be able to justify getting a small server nearing the end of it's warranty from the spare parts pool.  Make friends with the company sysadmin(s). If you are already familiar with Unix, get a Unix/Linux machine. If you are not familiar with Unix, try to get a Windows box to flatten your learning curve. You'll eventually want to learn Linux though, as more Oracle databases run on Linux in the real world than Windows.

Next, go sign up for an account (OTN) at Oracle Corporation's Technet site, otn.oracle.com (I am not affiliated with Oracle and do not benefit from any traffic going there!).  It's free, and you'll need this to download software under Oracle's development license (training is a legitimate use of Oracle software under this license agreement). Use this account to get access to the installation documents for the latest Oracle database release.  Pay specific attention to hardware requirements.

If the above is not possible, your next option is to purchase some hardware to create a sandbox for yourself.   If you can't afford very much, you might want to start with the Oracle XE database.  It's small and sleek and can be installed on most laptops.  The administration is slightly different on XE, but it's fine for learning SQL, stopping and starting a database, configuring listeners, etcetera.
Once you have your hardware, I recommend you start with the 2-DBA document, the "Adminstrator's Guide," "Concepts" and "SQL Language Reference".

Oracle Database Administration is one heck of a big elephant to eat.  It's a large body of knowledge, and it's a moving target.  You are not going to learn it two days, in spite of the title of some of the documentation.  Take it one small bite at a time.  When you encounter problems during your self-training, do a websearch to find how others have fixed the problem. If your company uses Oracle and has an Oracle Support agreement, I highly recommend going to your DBA team and asking them if you can be added to the company's CSI as a metalink user. You'll have to go to metalink and request an account on a specific CSI, so you'll have to obtain that number from the DBA team.  After you've made the request, Metalink sends an email to whomever is the administrator for that CSI (Customer Service Identifier), and they have to approve it, so it's better to talk to the DBA(s) first.  Just tell them that you want to learn Oracle on your own and would like to be able to read Metalink Notes.

If you have deep pockets, or your company is willing to pay for training, look into taking some courses with Oracle University.  My experience is that I get a lot more out of Oracle courses if I've done a little legwork first to get some exposure to what is being taught.  Since the courses are not cheap, it's a good investment of your time.  Oracle certification, by itself will *not* generally land you a job as an Oracle DBA; however, in a pool of equivalent candidates, it might be the "extra" thing that gets you to an interview.  Most companies perform a technical interview when hiring, often the interview is fairly rigorous.  Occasionally the interview is overly-rigorous, that is, someone in HR who knows nothing about Oracle has a set of questions they looked up on the internet, and they neither understand the question, nor the answer.  This can be in your favor in the sense that you probably won't get many tough follow-up questions... it can work against you though if there is more than way to do something, and the HR person only has one way listed in the expected answers.  For example, there are many ways to clone a database... cloning from a cold copy, rman duplicate, export/import... etcetera...

When I first aspired to become an Oracle DBA around 1998, I spent about two hours a day for about six months, while setting up an environmental data management database. I took my certification tests (one of them twice) and became a "Certified Oracle Professional". I really knew next to nothing, but at that point had enough "book knowledge" that I passed Oracle Corporation's 2-hour long technical interview and went to work for them as a junior DBA. I've come a long way since then, and even now eleven years later, I still learn new things all the time in the course of practicing my profession.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/2207135

A Name Is a Name - What Does It Mean?

Ever thought about it? What is a name, or maybe a title? Where did they come from and what do they mean?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: (on the web), they say that "a nameis a word or term used for identification. Names can identify a class or category of things, or a single thing, either uniquely, or within a given context."--- and it goes on.

They talk about a personal name or a specific individual person with a "special identifiable significant designation", a lot of long words that actually mean "unique". It's normally referred to as a "proper noun "or a "general name". They go on to go outside of personal identifications and reference animals such as the "Dolphin", a generalized noun for a specific selection, not the individual. Flowers also fit into this category. Sometimes, the flower names also are used as proper names as well, such as "Iris" or "Rose".

Sometimes confusion can enter the mental picture because some words or names mean entirely different things in other languages. There are words pronounced in Japanese that the same pronunciation in English but they have too different meanings. I've heard of at least one word in Spanish that when it's pronounced in English, it has two different meanings.

Personal names can be done accidentally as well. We have a grandson with the same first name as my great-grandmother's last name. Our daughter named him but had no idea the names were the same - even the spelling. Honestly, it pleases me because the family name from way back has been restored and carried on, at least in this one instance. Who knows where it will go from there. Maybe you have had the same experience.

We have a new great-grandson that has been named after his dad who was also named after his dad, thus giving him a suffix of "the third" (possibly). This little man has been given a large load for his tiny shoulders when he is grown.

Personal names can come from the idols of the time as well. How many mothers have named their girls after one of the heroes of that era? Take the name of "Debbie" from the late 50's and early 60's. Today, there are lots of "Debbie"s, and - I for one am glad about it. I just happen to like the name. Richard (Dick) for the male side is common as well. Of course, there are many others that both you and I hear about all the time without even thinking about it.

Then there are names from the Christian world of Biblical names for their children as well. Calib, John, Isaac, Jacob or Noah, all come from the Bible. I'm sure this could also be traced to other religions as well. Candice, Carla, Carol, Christine, Diana, Mary - there are pages and pages of Christian names that can be found on the web.

Cross-overs come into play as well. Francis, Leslie, Sean or Shawn (pronounced the same), Memory or Melody come to mind as well.

Name combinations as well, something that seems to be in practice today with success. Businesses do it all the time to name their new product, and if successful, that new name gets adopted into the language and becomes a household word. Does the name "Costco" or "Walmart" mean anything? Adoptive names sometimes make the list. If I were to use the word "apple", what's your thought? Computer -- or fruit?

I don't want to bore you with lists of names, but you get the idea and can carry it from there with people that you have crossed lives with, or family names as well. It is common to name ANYTHING and it should be. How would you describe those clouds you see in the sky - they do have a name. "Cirris"- "standing lenticular" - or "cumulonimbus" are specific names of clouds and there are many folks interested in them, such as pilots. They are very interested - that's their job and the safety of flight enters into the picture.

Even gadgets have names, slang words to describe what they are and what they do. What comes to mind when you hear the word "remote"? A thing for the TV, or maybe it's somewhere far away. Laptop can mean a small portable computer, or maybe grandma's or mom's lap, a nice place for a youngster to snuggle into. Sun-Roof? Something in a car? Maybe. Cool - Weather or??? You get the idea.

Don't sell a name short - try to think about how it's used, and why. When it comes to words, you have to use your mind, your brain. Context of where the word is and how it is used is the definition of the word as you use it.

Roy is retired military as a radar controller, both Airborne and Ground. Spent 9 years as a Radio Announcer and retired from the corporate world after 14 years as an information analysist, working with classified information for a computer chip manufacturer. Roy is a commercial pilot (ASEL) and has a degree in Interstate Commerce Commission law. Ezine Articles Platinum Expert Author.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/7294797

The Problem With Overconfidence

Confidence is a good thing. It's an appealing and useful quality and can contribute to personal and business success. However, overconfidence can be problematic and counter-productive. There's a fine line which should be recognized and not crossed.

Personal Confidence

Having personal confidence in yourself and your abilities can help you in your career. Employers, co-workers and customers are reassured by someone who appears to know what they are doing and has confidence in their ability to get the job done. Confidence is Contagious. Even if you're "bluffing" the reaction of those who interact with you will be influenced by your actions and attitudes. A lack of confidence will cause you and those around you to have doubts about your abilities and performance. These are normal human reactions.

Think about the last time you took a commercial airline flight. Was the pilot confident and reassuring? Of course! If the pilot expressed tentative attitudes, doubt, uncertainty and confusion, your own confidence in the outcome of the flight might be shaken. You might even be inclined to disembark prior to departure. Flying is stressful enough without the added burden of uncertainty. A successful flying experience is therefore to some extent based on a perception of confidence. Confidence that the hardware, systems and personnel involved will perform optimally, and that the outcome will be positive; that you will arrive at your intended destination safe and sound, and ideally, on time.

Overconfidence

If confidence is so good, then why wouldn't an abundance be better? Well, an abundance of confidence is fine but excessive confidence is not. There can be too much of a good thing. Confidence depends on a realistic, objective assessment of the individual's ability to perform. An overconfident employee is either dishonest or has flawed judgment. Either way it's a problem. Overconfidence can result in lapses, mistakes and delays. Misplaced confidence leads to mistrust. If in a transaction the performer expresses his ability to fulfill requirements and expectations, but cannot, the recipient of the inadequate and/or misrepresented services will be disappointed and dissatisfied. The under-performer may also experience ineptness or guilt.

It's easy to be fooled by those who over-promise and under-deliver. Although sometimes it is unavoidable, honest, and unintentional, other occasions are deceptive.

An Accurate Assessment

The solution to the problem of overconfidence lies in an accurate assessment. Accurate by both the employee and the boss. Perceptions of capacity and abilities must coincide with actual qualities in these areas. It is preferable to be conservative, but realistic. Look at preparation, credentials, education, but more importantly, prior performance. Evidence of ability through past performance is the best indicator that confidence is warranted. Confidence can, and should be, built and increased over time, with experience, performance, and success. Be realistic in your own assessment of self-confidence and your confidence in others. Sometimes what appears to be overconfidence is really not. The problem arises when real overconfidence isn't recognized, challenged and corrected.

Copyright © 2011, Dr. Ben A. Carlsen, MBA. All Rights Reserved Worldwide for all Media. You may reprint this article in your ezine, newsletter, newspaper, magazine, website, etc. as long as you leave all of the links active, do not edit the article in any way, leave my name and bio box intact, and you follow all of the EzineArticles Terms of Service for Publishers.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6206073

Trust in Being Brave - The Merrill Lynch Story

During the eighties, I spent a decade at a Wall Street bank in a variety of different positions, most of which I viewed as nothing more than a series of jobs to pay the bills. Yes, that's how I viewed my purpose on this planet at one time. It took a major awakening in the late 80's to snap out of this sleepy way of life.

Towards the end of ten years at this bank, I was itching to make another change and move on because I knew I was capable of doing much more than what I was doing at the time. I had no idea what I would do but I put myself in an open frame of mind and prepared to seize an opportunity when it came my way. There's a saying that when you are ready, it will come.

I didn't have to wait long. The timing was right.
Someone I knew who happened to be vice president at Merrill Lynch told me they were looking for new stockbroker trainees. After telling me about career opportunities at the company, he asked if I would be interested in going to work for them as a future stockbroker. I immediately said I would. ("Plan to say yes to opportunities!")

An appointment was set for an interview with the branch vice president at the Fifth Avenue location (New York City) where they had an opening. It was scheduled on a cold, blustery day in February 1992.

I'll never forget walking into his office. It looked like a Ritz Carlton penthouse suite complete with plush carpeting, expensive oil paintings, a king-sized maghoney desk and a complete living room set along with countless of sales awards. I didn't see a marbled bathroom in there but wouldn't have been surprised if there was one! The place was a statement of tremendous wealth and success.
The vice president was a young, successful sales manager who was dressed to the nines for success. I liked him the moment we met. He had an air of confidence that was refreshing. The man was articulate and laughed easily. But despite his friendly manner, I was intimidated. The lofty atmosphere was not something I was used to. My time at the bank was rather drab in comparison.

We talked for a grand total of twenty minutes after which he requested that I make an appointment with twelve of his stockbrokers, all of whom had offices of their own. That meant they were bringing in a healthy six or seven figures a year. The vice president also told me to write up a marketing proposal on how I would build my clientele if he were to hire me. He shook my hand firmly and wished me luck.

The more I thought about a new career as a stockbroker, the more passionate I became. Thoughts like "financial freedom," "act as your own boss," "earn what you put into it" got me excited.
I should mention that shortly after my introductory interview, I was struck down with a nasty cold that threatened to put me out of commission. However, because I had an overwhelming sense of passion about making this career change and trusted that life was about to get better and better, I forced myself to make those 12 appointments and went through with it.

What followed was an unbelievable series of even more obstacles during the interviews. Not only was I feeling crappy at the beginning, but each and every one of the interviewers said that being a stockbroker was "very tough." They invariably told me that 80 percent of newcomers failed within their first year and that there was a lot of rejection to content with. Some even had the gall to tell me I was better off in my nine-to-five job at the bank!

My stomach tightened with each passing interview but my overriding faith more than made up for it. I refused to let their comments derail me. Never before was I so determined to succeed with the task at hand!

By the time I went back to the branch manager two months later for the final interview, I was exhausted. But I walked into his office with my head up high and proudly handed him my marketing proposal that I worked so hard to put together.

His reaction to the proposal was disappointing. He hardly looked at it, tossing it aside. The vice president's face was frowning probably because he had other things on his mind.
He absentmindedly picked up a paper clip and started to fumble with it, not saying anything for the longest time. The silence was literally deafening. It was obvious that the vice president was struggling mightily with a decision. Although the 12 interviews went well, he seemed unsure that I had what it took to be successful.

Suddenly, without warning, I was seized with an overpowering sense that this was "my moment." My skin felt prickly, a sure sign that my inner voice was telling me to do something.
It was now or never.

I instantly knew what I had to do. Did I have the guts to do it?
My heart yammered like crazy over what I was about to do.
Pointing my shaky finger at him, I mustered the courage to speak up and forever changed the course of my life: "Sir, if you don't hire me, you'll never know what I can do for this firm."
Then I did the hardest thing I ever had to do. I shut my mouth and waited.
The moment I spoke, it was as if everything was slow motion like in the movies. He stopped fumbling with the paperclip, looked at me with those piercing eyes and then shocked me with a smile - his first since walking in that morning. Then he threw the badly deformed paperclip into the wastepaper basket with a resounding clunk. Two points for him.

Taking a deep breath, he said, "Okay, you got the job."
Enormously relieved, I was halfway out of my chair and was about to shake his hand but before I had a chance, the young vice president thrust his finger in the air and said, "on one condition."
Slowly sinking back into my chair I said, "What's that?"

"You must resign from your job at the bank effective two weeks from today, come to us and we'll train you for three months on a small salary. Then you'll have to take the securities examination. It's 250 questions long." he said.

Lowering his voice slightly, he warned, "Mr. Hopson, if you fail by one point, YOU'RE OUT!" He made a larger than life gesture with his thumb like an empire calling an OUT in a baseball game.
Despite this shocking statement, it took all of 2 seconds to reply. "Ok, I'll take it."
I'll never forget the look on my boss's face at the bank the next morning when I handed in my resignation. He raised his bushy eyebrows and sarcastically said, "What's this?" Wall Street was undergoing a major shake-up at the time. The market had bottomed out and interest rates were soaring. On the surface, it appeared it was not the "right" time to make such a drastic career move but I did it anyway.

Two weeks later, I cut the cord at the bank and left. During the following three months of training at Merrill Lynch, I studied for the exam, acted as a "gofer" (for the established brokers) and kept my nose to the grindstone, doing the best I could.

Finally, it came time to take the securities exam in April of 1992. Taking the elevator up to the 4th floor of a beautiful gleaming glass building downtown, I followed signs to the testing room. After showing identification and signing in, I took a seat in the waiting area. From where I sat, I could see rows of computers and uncomfortable looking chairs through a window that served as a wall between the reception area and the testing room. There were a handful of other applicants in the waiting room with me. It reminded me of an open casting call in Hollywood. They all appeared like nervous out of work actors, biting their fingernails and shifting their feet. I did my best to ignore them.

The exam proctor led us to our assigned computers, gave us appropriate instructions and then told us to begin.

Two and a half hours later, I pressed the enter button on the keyboard. A colorful pop-up window came up, asking if I was done and whether I wanted to review my answers. No sense in second guessing myself so I clicked "Finish."

A flashing message followed with: "Please wait while your scores are being tabulated."
My mind immediately flashed back to the day of the final interview with the vice president's ominous warning, "If you fail by one point, you're out!"

I swallowed hard and waited and waited. After what seemed like hours, this showed up on the screen:
"Congratulations, you passed with a score of 83! Go to the front desk and retrieve a printout of your test results. Thank you and have a good day!"

From that point on, I never looked back. In my first year as a rookie stockbroker, I earned a paltry $16,000 - people on welfare was probably making more than me! Four years later, I was bringing in $300,000. Even CNN came to interview me.

If I hadn't acted on my intuition and boldly told the vice president, Sir, if you don't hire me, you'll never know what I can do for this firm, I might still be tolling away at the bank, desperately waiting for retirement to arrive. Who knows?

Food for thought: When you scrounge up the courage to be brave, you find out what you're truly capable of doing, garnering handsome rewards in the process.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/268271